Reform is facing criticism for its perceived shift towards supporting Ukraine’s inclusion in NATO, with accusations of aligning with Putin’s stance. Labour MP Calvin Bailey, a former RAF wing commander, has denounced Nigel Farage and his associates for echoing Kremlin-influenced viewpoints. This backlash follows Richard Tice, Farage’s deputy, stating that Ukraine should not join NATO if it opposes Russian President Vladimir Putin’s stance.
Tice proposed that Kyiv should accept a challenging compromise to secure peace. Earlier, Farage emphasized the importance of integrating the war-ravaged nation into NATO, but recent statements indicate a change in position within Reform’s leadership.
Bailey expressed disappointment in Reform’s apparent retreat from advocating for Ukraine’s NATO membership, citing Farage’s historical admiration for Putin as a possible influence. He criticized Farage and his allies for pushing Kremlin-aligned narratives, asserting that the public is not swayed by such tactics.
Despite the controversy, Bailey affirmed Ukraine’s inevitable journey towards NATO membership. Recent events, including Farage being labeled a “Putin-supporting free speech pretender” during his testimony in the US Congress, have fueled the ongoing debate.
In a notable 2014 interview, Farage commended Putin as a skilled strategist but distanced himself from endorsing him as a person. While Reform’s leader previously stressed the necessity of Ukraine joining NATO for peace, Tice’s recent statements indicate a willingness to explore alternative solutions requiring Kyiv to make uncomfortable concessions for a lasting resolution.
Tice suggested that the UK government should target £25 billion of frozen Russian assets, emphasizing Putin’s financial interests as a potential leverage point. He noted that seizing Putin’s wealth could influence his behavior positively, leading to a shift in his approach towards international relations.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has consistently advocated for Ukraine’s NATO accession, highlighting the collective defense principle of the alliance. Tice raised the question of whether prioritizing Ukraine’s NATO membership over peace negotiations with Russia would be counterproductive, proposing a reevaluation of diplomatic approaches.
A spokesperson for Reform defended the party’s unwavering support for Ukraine’s security and emphasized Tice’s humanitarian efforts in the country, dismissing Labour’s criticisms as unfounded attacks.
